User avatar
Norm Mikoto @mikoto@akko.wtf
3y
nosql databse
agpl3
cla
​:reimu_sigh:​
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
3y
@mikoto its not postgres!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
⭐1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
3y
@mikoto reinventing the wheel as always
:neofox_think_woozy@akko.wtf:1⭐1
1
0
0
2

User avatar
Norm Mikoto @mikoto@akko.wtf
3y
@jeder yeah

like I don't mind seeing new DB stuff, especially if they want to try something new like neo4j.
But the CLA crap means it's likely to become proprietary at a moment's notice and that sucks when there's no easy way to migrate away later on
⭐1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
[GRLC] ralseiblunt @novenary@akko.wtf
3y
@mikoto @jeder cla or not, agpl is very non-free to begin with anyway, and also difficult to comply with
not to mention that it's ambiguous, a database engine is not meant to be exposed to users so is it even applicable there? who knows!
⭐1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
Norm Mikoto @mikoto@akko.wtf
3y
@novenary @jeder it's basically a way to do vendor lockin without looking overtly proprietary like oracle
0
0
0
0