3y
i do not understand people who criticise gnome for not being set up exactly the way they like it by default and refusing to admit that extensions are a supported, official, encouraged way to add functionality and modify behaviour

if gnome didn’t want you to modify the desktop to the way you like, why would they even let you install extensions? why would gnome host an extensions repository? why would gnome
just recently revamp the format to make it easier to make them? why would gnome willingly take the gnome tweaks and gnome extensions apps under the gnome umbrella?
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
3y
@nano they would stop breaking them on every update first if they really support extensions
⭐2
2
0
0
2
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
3y
@nano and would introduce something along the lines of gsconnect as a proper gnome thing instead of making forced downtime of at least a month on every update
1
0
0
0
3y
@jeder gsconnect relies on a kde-owned mobile app, so it is not ready for production
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
3y
@nano and how exactly is that a stopper when it's not proprietary?
⭐1
0
0
0
1