User avatar
Autumn Jo 🌧️ v_enby πŸ‚ @ShadowJonathan@tech.lgbt
2y
matrix bashing, a but grumpy So called "open source projects" when:
1
1
1
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender πŸ”œ eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
matrix bashing, a but grumpy @ShadowJonathan what do they even mean by this
1
0
1
0

User avatar
V Carnage, ε…­δΈƒ @sanity@corteximplant.net
2y
re: matrix bashing, a but grumpy @jeder @ShadowJonathan my best guess is "needs a company who's willing to buy this as a feature"
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender πŸ”œ eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
re: matrix bashing, a but grumpy @sanity @ShadowJonathan bruh
0
0
2
0
User avatar
Autumn Jo 🌧️ v_enby πŸ‚ @ShadowJonathan@tech.lgbt
2y
re: matrix bashing, a but grumpy @sanity @jeder no, they need the "Product" team to take a look at it

But realistically it stalls the issue forever since Product never looks or approves of community efforts like this
1
0
1
0
User avatar
V Carnage, ε…­δΈƒ @sanity@corteximplant.net
2y
re: matrix bashing, a but grumpy @ShadowJonathan @jeder so if we find a buyer, that'll be an incentive for product to have a looksie πŸ™ƒπŸ€‘
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Autumn Jo 🌧️ v_enby πŸ‚ @ShadowJonathan@tech.lgbt
2y
re: matrix bashing, a but grumpy @sanity @jeder pretty much their motivation at this point, yeah

Unless a feature makes money, don't spend anything on it, not even time
0
0
0
0