User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
cherry mx patent expiring was the best thing that happened to mechanical keyboards tbh
1
0
5
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
cope
kailh and gateron and many countless companies overtook you in the feeling of the switches ages ago now
1
0
3
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
kailh, the fucking company responsible for one of the shittiest switches ever
(remember that one? lmao)
1
0
2
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
that time when seeing kailh switches meant disgust
and now their box switches are quite praised lmao
1
0
2
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
and you barely ever even hear about cherry tbf
1
0
3
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
50 million actuations guaranteed
All CHERRY MX switches can rely on an impressive lifespan: all MX switches can handle more than 50 million actuations without any loss of quality. This does not mean that the switch is defective afterwards; it will continue to function without any problems. In internal laboratory tests, the switches are tested with much higher actuation numbers.

your shitty reds failed on me way earlier than that
2
0
2
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
3 fucking years
1
0
2
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
is 50 million actuations comparable to 3 years
2
0
2
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
my anne pro 2 with box browns still works after 4-5 years
the switches are now clicky instead of tactile but they still perfectly work without any doubleclicks, unlike your shitty reds
0
0
1
0
User avatar
Maciej @maciej73@pol.social
2y
@jeder Assuming it was used non-stop for 3 years:

3 years 365 days 24 hours 60 minutes 60 seconds = 94 608 000 seconds

94 608 000 seconds / 50 000 000 clicks = 1.89216 seconds / click

They failed prematurely. Or you were clicking them more often than one time per ≈1.9 seconds for three years with no breaks
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 eth0 @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2y
@maciej73 no of course it was not
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Maciej @maciej73@pol.social
2y
@jeder Of course, but I'm too lazy to calculate it with values that actually make sense. This still proves that they failed prematurely tho
0
0
1
0
User avatar
4censord neocat_flag_pan @4censord@sk.foopool.de
2y
@jeder you see, these tests are under laboratory conditions, without ever seeing any dust or anything like that
1
0
1
0
User avatar
4censord neocat_flag_pan @4censord@sk.foopool.de
2y
@jeder ah and ofcourse perfectly straight, with 0 wobble or the like
0
0
1
0