User avatar
Yaseeniko baba_yaseen agenderFlag transgenderFlag @yassie_j@labyrinth.zone
6mo
I read a “study” that compared European cities by walkability

The least walkable cities were Oslo, Marseille, Hamburg, Lisbon, Birmingham, Turin, Bordeaux, Prague, and Toulouse

That’s a very strange set of cities to place in your top ten, esp Oslo and Lisbon.

Well, the study looked at
walking only to the top five attractions in the city proper, rather than just the city centre…

So for Oslo this included Vigeland Park, which is nearly an hour on foot from the city centre (but ~20 min by train), for Hamburg this included the Port of Hamburg… Which… What? Why would you walk all that way??? That’s over an hour by foot!!! And for Birmingham included Cadbury World, which is 90+ min on foot from the city centre, but only 20 min by train?

So this is not “how walkable a city is”, but “how close it’s main tourist attractions are to each other if you forget that buses, trains, and trams exist”
❤️11
8
5
2
2
User avatar
Yaseeniko baba_yaseen agenderFlag transgenderFlag @yassie_j@labyrinth.zone
6mo
radicalstorage.com/travel/most-walkable-cities/

Okay the methodology is actually EVEN WORSE than I thought.

They ranked cities by how quickly you can walk
between these attractions if you were to do a walking tour. For Birmingham, this takes over three hours. Which… Yes of course it would.

Villa Park is in the inner north, Cadbury World is in the far south, and the other three are in the city core… What tourist is choosing to do a walking tour between all of these places?? This is not an itinerary that makes sense. I am sure it is the same for the other “worst” cities on this list

Did this website not know how tourism works or anything?
❤️1
8
3
0
1
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 Hikari @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
6mo
@yassie_j opinion discarded
1
0
4
0

User avatar
Yaseeniko baba_yaseen agenderFlag transgenderFlag @yassie_j@labyrinth.zone
6mo
@jeder lmao
0
0
1
0