User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
RE: soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de/@MagicLike/116114131184286439

this scrub is still going btw - 27.60% - 6 days 18 hours 31 minutes 48 seconds remaining

and I have no idea how the fuck this is supposed to take like over a week in total what the hell
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike how fast is it going though
1
0
0
0
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger in the sense of drive I/O or how fast the scrub is progressing?
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike what the scrub status line in zpool status is reporting
1
0
0
0
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger
scan: scrub in progress since Sun Feb 22 00​:03:​02 2026
4.66T / 16.8T scanned at 21.8M/s, 4.65T / 16.8T issued at 21.8M/s
0B repaired, 27.63% done, 6 days 18​:46:​18 to go
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike interesting. how does IO look? zpool iostat -v 5

scrub does slow itself down a
lot if there is competing IO on the pool. also make sure you aren't having one disk struggling, though zpool status should make that very obvious
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger before I make a mess here with pasting the terminal table output - all 4 disks basically have the same read I/O of ~1,5M and basically 0 write I/O
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1
2
0
0
1
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike alright

zpool iostat -vl 5 should tell you which disk is the bottleneck in that case, look for high latency
also may wanna run SMART tests tbh
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger here as well I can't spot anything out of the ordinary, yes one or two disks might lag a few ms behind sometimes but there is no real pattern to it that I can spot...
2
0
0
0
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger SMART tests also show nothing out of the ordinary
1
0
0
0
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger (I run short ones daily and long ones monthly)
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike well, that narrows it down

what's your vdev topology? raidz1 with four HDDs, or something else?

also, what's your fragmentation?
zpool list -o name,frag,cap,size

what's your
cat /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_vdev_scrub_max_active at
:drgn_heart@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net:1
1
0
0
1
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger

yup raidz1 with 4 drives

frag 1%, cap 57%, size 29.1T

zfs_vdv_scrub_max_active: 3
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike this is abysmal speed for the given settings, which all look perfectly fine.

something aint right with the HDDs themselves here, those are random IO speeds or worse. this basically has to be connectivity issues of some kind, with scrubs nowadays generally running at sequential read speed.
i dont presume you'd be using SMR drives for ZFS, so it's likely not that.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger It could be that this is the built in storage controller of this HP ProLiant ML110 G7 - I recently discovered that it only gives 2 of the 4 drives a SATA 6 Gbit/s bandwidth and the rest only SATA 3 Gbit/s. Tho tbh this should not be an issue imo as the drives (Seagate Exos 7E10 8TB model ST8000NM017B) max out at 255 MB/s of max sustained I/O.
I could simply try pausing and resuming the scrub, reboot ig and see if it is that and otherwise reseat the drives... But other than that I am running out of ideas.

One thing about the disk I/O: from time to time there are read spikes of around 50 MB/s before dropping down to 1,5 MB/s
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike the B110i is apparently problematic in general and sometimes chokes on larger queue depths, stalling reads before draining it (which would fit your read speed spikes)
may be worth looking into an LSI HBA
2
0
0
0
User avatar
MagicLike verifiedbi neodog_flag_nb neocat_floof_fcknzs @MagicLike@soc.sekundenklebertransportverbot.de
4mo
@privateger yea I already am, found one that is completely overkill in terms of ports but I get the most for my money here and can reuse it once I upgrade NAS hardware in a few years - the LSI 9300-16i, which goes for 71€ on ebay refurbished
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike yeah i was gonna suggest ebay
9300 is a decent pick, but mind that those are essentially two SAS3008 controllers in one PCB and therefore use ~2x the power (~27W) and heat.
the 9305-16i is the single-chip alternative that runs cooler if you care about that
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Latte macchiato blobcoffee ablobcat_longlong @privateger@plasmatrap.com
4mo
@MagicLike i had a 9300 and it needed a fan taped to it to not crash lol
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 Mizukon @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
4mo
@privateger @MagicLike woooooozy
:neocat_googly_woozy@plasmatrap.com:1
0
0
1
1