User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 Mizukon @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2w
sure thing boss
2
0
1
0
User avatar
Bicycle grease whiffer @lilylunatic@estrogen.network
2w
@jeder why is this such a common thing in bike lane design - does this protect drivers legally?
1
0
1
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 Mizukon @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2w
@lilylunatic cyclists must disembark before crossing, so, technically, yes
4
0
2
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 Mizukon @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2w
@lilylunatic however the sign they use is also bad because this is not a cycling path but path shared by pedestrians and cyclists
1
0
1
0
User avatar
Jeder neocat_floof_googly_woozy neocat_flag_agender 🔜 Mizukon @jeder@miau.jeder.pl
2w
@lilylunatic also many of these pairs should not even be there because on first photo that's actually not an intersection but an access road to a building, and since cyclists and pedestrians are on main road, anyone entering or leaving the road would have to yield anyway
but then also majority of drivers yield to pedestrians on the cyclist crossing (without accompanying zebra), and vice versa so you can say rules here are incredibly lax
0
0
1
0